Claims and context
Explore claim types, the periods in which cases appeared, and the regions where decisions were recorded.
Claims, outcomes, awards and locations for one organisation's published cases.
Discover patterns in published employment disputes involving an organisation, from claim types and outcomes to awards, locations and changes over time.
Claims, outcomes and change over time for one organisation, read as a pattern rather than one judgment at a time.
Explore an organisation's tribunal footprint from several angles. Understand the claims recorded, how published cases concluded and how the picture varies over time, without relying on isolated judgments.
Explore claim types, the periods in which cases appeared, and the regions where decisions were recorded.
See reported outcomes and monetary awards where those details are available and meet reporting thresholds.
Place supported findings alongside industry and national published-decision baselines, with coverage kept visible.
The report connects claims, outcomes, awards and comparisons for one organisation.
The report connects multiple dimensions of an organisation's published history. Explore the types of evidence it brings together.
Explore the types of claims attributed to an organisation, alongside recorded activity by year and region. A claim-mix percentage can overlap where cases involve more than one claim.
Similar names are not always the same legal entity, so the report starts with organisation selection.
Similar names don't always identify the same legal entity. Yerty begins with organisation selection and builds a research report around the published cases attributed to that record.
Search a business name and review matching organisational records before choosing the intended respondent.
Where at least five distinct published cases are available, review and confirm a report using a report credit.
Read the research profile, open sampled case records and ask Yerty to explain supported figures within your saved report.
A published tribunal history offers useful evidence about recorded disputes. It cannot reveal every employment issue or explain an organisation's behaviour outside the published decisions.
The application groups some spelling variations and presents candidates for selection. It does not construct corporate group trees; some records may require an identity review. Case coverage and identity matching should be checked before drawing conclusions.
Explore an organisation's recorded tribunal history through a structured report, with sources and clear limits to what the findings can establish.
One report credit per generated Employer History report; one-off credits and subscriptions are available.