yerty/tribunal-intelligence/report — statistical benchmarking
Generate a statistical Benchmark Report.
Pick a claim type, sector and region, and Yerty builds a statistical report from the published tribunal record — the claim landscape, outcomes, awards, timing and costs for cases like the one in front of you.
For lawyers, advisers, insurers, funders — and claimants — who need to value the risk in an employment tribunal claim.
Disability discrimination · Retail · 2025
How it works
Two steps to a Benchmark Report.
Set the parameters and let Yerty read the matching decisions — you get a report you can act on, not a press-release headline.
Set the parameters
Choose claim type, sector, region and time period — as broad or as narrow as the case in front of you.
Yerty builds the report
We read every matching published decision and compute the statistics — landscape, outcomes, awards, timing and costs.
What's in a Benchmark Report
Five sections, one cited document.
Every Benchmark Report is built from the same five sections — and every figure links back to the published decisions behind it.
Claim landscape
Which claims are being brought, in what combinations, and how the mix is shifting — so you can see the shape of cases like yours, not one in isolation.
Outcomes
The outcome split for comparable claims — upheld, dismissed, withdrawn or struck out — read from the published decisions, not headline counts.
Awards
Median, range and distribution of compensatory awards by claim type, sector and region — the “is this offer reasonable?” answer a press release can’t give.
Journey and timing
How long comparable cases take — claim to first hearing to decision — and where the time actually goes along the way.
Costs and procedural risk
Costs orders, deposit orders, strike-outs and the procedural risks that shape exposure before a case ever reaches a final hearing.
From the record
Real outcomes. Real distributions. Real cases.
Every figure in a Benchmark Report ties back to a published decision. Click any number to see the cases behind it. This is what reporting on tribunals should look like when it's grounded in the public record rather than press releases.
A note on the methodology
Documented. Versioned. Coverage stated.
Every figure is reproducible. Every dataset is versioned. Every known limitation is published — including what isn't in the data (unpublished settlements, withdrawn claims) and where extraction accuracy is highest and lowest.
Source. Published UK employment tribunal decisions from the official register, extracted weekly.
Coverage. What is and isn't observable — published decisions yes; settled, withdrawn or unpublished cases no. Stated, not hidden.
Citations. Every figure links to the underlying decisions. No black boxes.
Get notified at launch
Join the waitlist.
We are launching soon. Join the waitlist and we'll let you know when you can get in — and what's in it first for your kind of work.
Elsewhere on yerty
More from the platform.
Ask the Record
Intelligence Hub's employment dispute research assistant. Ask in plain English, answered from the record with citations.
See how it works →yerty/pressFor journalists
Citable figures, methodology one-pager, same-day data desk, expert comment on tribunal trends.
Press & media →yerty/claimant-hubIn a workplace dispute yourself?
Claimant Hub gives workers guided support through a dispute — a clearer route through their own case.
Go to Claimant Hub →Intelligence Hub is built on published UK employment tribunal decisions. Unpublished settlements, withdrawn claims, and proceedings that weren't selected for publication are not observable. See the methodology for extraction accuracy, coverage statistics and known biases. Yerty provides data and analytics — not legal advice.