Choose the primary claim
Your primary claim type determines the comparison group. Additional selections can add context or supported comparison slices.
Yerty Intelligence · Case Benchmark
See the bigger picture across a claim.
Outcomes, awards, journeys and comparisons for one claim type, in one briefing.
Bring outcomes, awards, case journeys and key comparisons together in one structured research briefing. Understand how cases with a claim type tend to go, and where to explore further.
Research into past cases, not an assessment or prediction of an individual claim.
YertyIntelligence HubCase benchmark
Case benchmarkUnfair dismissal, retail, North West
Published judgments with this claim profile.
Comparable cases312
Claim typeUnfair dismissal
Decided2019 to 2026
Prepared3 November 2026
The short answer
Won by the claimantAbout 1 in 4
Lost at a full hearingAbout 1 in 3
Typical award where won£8,900
How did the cases end?
Won81 of 312
Lost109 of 312
Dismissed early39 of 312
Other83 of 312
YertyIntelligence HubCase benchmark
Employment tribunal · Case benchmarkUnfair dismissal, retail, North West
Published judgments with this claim profile. Settled and withdrawn claims do not appear.
Comparable cases312
Claim typeUnfair dismissal
Decided2019 to 2026
Prepared3 November 2026
The short answer
Won by the claimantAbout 1 in 4
Lost at a full hearingAbout 1 in 3
Dismissed or struck out before a hearingAbout 1 in 8
Typical award where the claimant won£8,900
How did the cases end?
Outcome
Won81 of 312
Lost109 of 312
Dismissed early39 of 312
Other83 of 312
Represented
Both sides137 of 312
Employer only106 of 312
Claimant only25 of 312
Neither44 of 312
Illustrative · figures are a composite
One connected claim briefing
What you get
More than a single statistic.
Start with a claim type, then examine what each measure shows.
Case Benchmark brings several research perspectives into one place. Start with a claim type, then examine what the different measures reveal, without confusing national filings with published decisions.
01 / Outcomes
See the different ways claims conclude.
Understand the wider picture from official national figures, then examine outcomes among published decisions. These are different populations, and the report keeps them separate.
- Official national context
- Published-case outcome analysis
- Clear labels and denominators
YertyINTELLIGENCE HUBCASE BENCHMARK · OUTCOMES
Unfair dismissal, retail, North West
How did the cases end?
Official national figures · all claims
Settled via ACASabout 2 in 5
Withdrawnabout 1 in 4
Decided at hearingabout 1 in 6
Otherabout 1 in 8
Published decisions · this claim profile
Won81 of 312
Lost109 of 312
Dismissed early39 of 312
Other83 of 312
The two panels describe different populations. Published decisions do not include claims settled or withdrawn before a judgment.
Illustrative · figures are a composite
Cross-analysis · A core capability
See where the patterns differ.
Compare a region, industry or representation category with the wider claim-type population, where the evidence supports it.
Overall figures are only the beginning. Explore how a selected region, industry or representation category compares with the wider population for a claim type, where the evidence is sufficient to support a comparison.
Explore the comparisons
These are comparisons within a primary-claim population, not a claim that every field narrows the whole report.
YertyINTELLIGENCE HUBCASE BENCHMARK · CROSS-ANALYSIS
Regional comparison
How does this slice compare?
All unfair dismissal cases26% won
North West31% won
North West cases in this claim type were won slightly more often than the national rate. Regions with fewer than 30 published cases are not shown.
Illustrative · figures are a composite
One report, several ways to understand a claim.
See an example report These comparisons sit alongside claim outcomes, award context, companion claims, procedural features and linked decisions.
Breadth first, then depth
Understand the context. Know where to investigate next.
A broad briefing for one claim type, with links to the comparable decisions.
Case Benchmark is a broad research briefing for a primary claim type. It brings several dimensions together and links to comparable decisions so you can continue the investigation.
- Companion claimsWhich claims commonly appear alongside the primary claim
- Supported comparisonsRepresentation, industry and region
- Comparable decisionsRecent published decisions, opened from the report
- Ask YertyOpen it from your saved report to discuss the recorded figures
YertyINTELLIGENCE HUBJUDGMENT ANALYTICS
2019 to 2026All regionsAll claim types
ClaimsBy type and year
IndustriesWhere cases arise
RespondentsNamed organisations
RepresentationWho had a representative
AwardsWhat was awarded
Case journeysHow long, which steps
Claims · share of published decisions
Unfair dismissalabout 2 in 5
Unpaid wagesabout 1 in 4
Disability discriminationabout 1 in 6
Sex discriminationabout 1 in 10
Illustrative · figures are a composite
How benchmarking works
A simpler way to research a complex question.
Build a saved briefing, see the comparison clearly and continue into the underlying research. You remain in control of report generation.
Bring the evidence together
Review outcomes, award patterns, journeys, companion claims and contrasting views, with sample and coverage limitations where needed.
Keep researching
Revisit your saved report, open comparable cases, or ask Yerty about the figures it contains. Generation uses one report credit on confirmation.
Research with confidence
Clear comparisons. Clear boundaries.
Useful intelligence means understanding what is being compared. Case Benchmark is designed around historical research, not forecasting an individual's legal position.
Does it find cases identical to mine?
No. The primary claim defines the comparison group. Additional fields such as region, industry or representation can support contrast analysis where sufficient data exist; they don't all narrow the group to identical cases.
Does it include every employment dispute?
No. Research into published decisions cannot include every settlement, withdrawal or unpublished event. Official national figures are used separately for wider system context.
Can I explore the underlying cases?
The report contains a selection of comparable published decisions linking into case pages. Not every aggregate figure has a direct case-level drill-down.
Can Ask Yerty explain my report?
Yes. When opened from a supported saved report, Ask Yerty can use its stored figures as context and explain them. It does not recalculate the report or provide individual case predictions.
How do I access a report?
You can buy a report credit without a subscription or use credits included in eligible paid plans. Review and confirm the report before spending a credit.
Yerty Case Benchmark
Bring the research together.
From one claim type to a clearer understanding of outcomes, awards and the wider case context.