Intelligence Hub

Understand similar cases. Build better context.

Case intelligence for workplace disputes.

Intelligence Hub helps lawyers, employers, funders, researchers and claimants compare cases, inspect outcomes, ask questions in plain English and understand workplace dispute patterns with clearer context.

Access is not publicly priced yet · Join the waitlist for launch updates

Why structured matters

~120,000 decisions, read and structured.

The judgments are already public — but the raw record only lets you read one case at a time. Yerty reads every one and structures it, so outcomes, industries, representation and regions become comparable across the whole record. Not another search box over the public record.

Record
Yerty
Reading
Outcomes
Industry
Representation
Region
Raw record: 0 structured · Yerty: all five
Learn about our dataCoverage

So you see the pattern, not just the cases.

What's in Intelligence Hub

From search to Benchmark Report — and back to the cases.

Explore the structured record, generate a statistical Benchmark Report, then work the evidence behind it. One dataset, three connected tools.

01 — Explorer

Explorer

Search the structured tribunal record.

  • Browse published decisions
  • Filter by claim, outcome, sector, region, representation
  • Read the underlying cases
02 — Report

Report

Generate a statistical Benchmark Report.

  • Claim landscape
  • Outcomes
  • Awards
  • Journey and timing
  • Costs and procedural risk
03 — Workspace

Workspace

Work the evidence behind the report.

  • Ask the Record
  • Case & document explorer
  • Saved reports and items
  • Dashboards
  • Advanced filters

What you can do with it

Three workflows Intelligence Hub makes easy.

From benchmarking a sector before review season to checking whether a settlement offer is generous — the kind of questions that used to require a researcher.

Workflow 01

Benchmark your sector before it benchmarks itself.

Compare your industry's tribunal exposure against the record — claims volume, award distributions, time-to-hearing, the trends moving year-on-year. Ground policy reviews, training priorities and EPL insurance conversations in what tribunals are actually deciding.

For: HR · Risk · Insurance · Advisers
Specimen — claims volume by sector, TTM
Hospitality+14% vs LY
Retail−3% vs LY
Logistics+9% vs LY
Finance−1% vs LY
illustrative · wire to live views before launch
Workflow 02

Find out what cases like yours have been worth.

For employment lawyers and claimants. See the actual award distribution for claims like the one you're advising on — median, range, percentile — by claim type, sector, and region. The "is this offer reasonable?" answer the press release can't give you.

For: Solicitors · Claimants · Trade unions
Specimen — disability discrimination, retail, 2025
Median award£24,100
Range (lowest → highest)£4,200 → £88,500
Time, claim → hearing11 months
Cases sampled57
illustrative · wire to live views before launch
Workflow 03

Research a respondent's tribunal history.

Look up any organisation that's appeared in a published decision: how many times, which claim types, what the outcomes were. For lawyers preparing claims; for journalists checking corporate behaviour; for researchers tracking the system.

For: Lawyers · Journalists · Researchers
Specimen — major UK retailer, last 24 months
Total published decisions18
Most-claimedUnfair dismissal · 11
Outcome split (claimant won)7 of 18 · 39%
Total awards paid£187,400
illustrative · respondent canonicalisation in progress

From the record

Real outcomes. Real distributions. Real cases.

Every figure in a Benchmark Report ties back to a published decision. Click any number to see the cases behind it. This is what reporting on tribunals should look like when it's grounded in the public record rather than press releases.

A snapshot — median awards, 2025
Disability discriminationretail£24,100
Sex discriminationfinance£31,400
Race discriminationhospitality£18,900
Unfair dismissalhospitality£9,800
Unauthorised deductionslogistics£2,350
Claim → first hearingnational11 mo
source: yerty/tribunal-intelligence · published ET decisions · figures illustrative until launch

A note on the methodology

Documented. Versioned. Coverage stated.

Every figure is reproducible. Every dataset is versioned. Every known limitation is published — including what isn't in the data (unpublished settlements, withdrawn claims) and where extraction accuracy is highest and lowest.

Source. Published UK employment tribunal decisions from the official register, extracted weekly.

Coverage. What is and isn't observable — published decisions yes; settled, withdrawn or unpublished cases no. Stated, not hidden.

Citations. Every figure links to the underlying decisions. No black boxes.

Get notified at launch

Join the waitlist.

We are launching soon. Join the waitlist and we'll let you know when you can get in — and what's in it first for your kind of work.

I'm a…
Email only. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy

Elsewhere on yerty

More from the platform.

Intelligence Hub is built on published UK employment tribunal decisions. Unpublished settlements, withdrawn claims, and proceedings that weren't selected for publication are not observable. See the methodology for extraction accuracy, coverage statistics and known biases. Yerty provides data and analytics — not legal advice.