Skip to main content
yerty
Yerty Intelligence · Claim Adjustments

See what changes the award.

How Acas Code adjustments and reductions appear in published awards, and the difference they make.

A specialist historical research report, not a compensation calculator or a prediction of what anyone will receive.
YertyINTELLIGENCE HUBCLAIM ADJUSTMENTS
Unfair dismissal · single-claimant published awards · 2019 to 2026

Which adjustments were recorded?

Acas Code adjustmentAward increased for a failure to follow the Acas Codeabout 1 in 10
Polkey reductionCompensation reduced for the chance of a fair dismissal anywayabout 1 in 7
Contributory faultAward reduced for the claimant's own conductabout 1 in 6
Frequency

How often each mechanism appears in the published awards for this claim type.

Comparison

How recorded awards differ with and without the mechanism.

Illustrative · figures are a composite
One specialist report. Several layers of context.
Acas Code adjustmentsPolkeyContributory faultClaim-type context
What the report reveals

More than whether an adjustment happened.

Which mechanisms were recorded, how often, and how the awards differ when they are present.

01 / Identify

Which mechanisms appear?

Explore where mechanisms such as Acas Code adjustments, Polkey reductions and contributory fault are identified in the published decisions.

02 / Compare

How do the amounts differ?

Compare recorded award distributions with and without an identified mechanism, for supported claim types, where at least 30 awards are available.

03 / Understand

What do those findings mean?

Read plain-language explanations of the mechanism, the relevant population and why a comparison should not be treated as a calculation for a personal case.

Interactive report walkthrough

Investigate the mechanisms behind the figures.

Pick a mechanism to see what the report asks of it.

Inside Claim AdjustmentsIllustrative panels · figures are a composite
Mechanism 01

When is an Acas Code adjustment recorded?

Explore the published cases in which an Acas Code adjustment is recorded, and compare the awards in that group with awards where it was not identified.

  • Recorded frequency within the supported claim type
  • Comparison of historical award distributions
  • Notes on what these observations do and do not establish
YertyINTELLIGENCE HUBCLAIM ADJUSTMENTS · ACAS CODE
Unfair dismissal · single-claimant published awards · 2019 to 2026

When was an Acas Code adjustment recorded?

Awards with an Acas Code adjustment42 of 418 · about 1 in 10
Typical adjustment15%
Adjustment of 25% (the maximum)Fewer than 1 in 20 of those
Typical award · with and without
Adjustment recorded
£14,20042 awards
Not recorded
£8,900376 awards

The recorded amounts already include the adjustment. Cases with an adjustment tend to differ in other ways too, so the gap is not the adjustment alone.

Illustrative · figures are a composite
A crucial distinction

Study the recorded award. Don't recalculate it.

Published amounts already reflect mechanisms applied in the decision. Yerty investigates those recorded figures. It doesn't apply a percentage to someone's salary or produce a new net compensation estimate.

  • ✓Historical observations, not personal forecasts
  • ✓Separate frequency from monetary comparisons
  • ✓Claim-specific explanations and coverage notes
Specialist depth

The detail behind a broader benchmark.

Case Benchmark covers the whole claim type; Claim Adjustments goes deep on one question.

Use it when the broader picture isn't enough and the adjustment mechanisms deserve their own investigation.

What makes this a specialist report

Focused analysis, with the context preserved.

Mechanism frequencyWhat appears in the published awards
With / without comparisonHistorical award figures
Claim-family explanationWhere relevant
Data quality boundariesCoverage and sample limits

What is shown depends on the supported claim family and whether the sample is sufficient.

How it works

From question to a focused research briefing.

You control generation; a credit is spent only when you confirm.

01 · Select

Choose a claim type

Start with the supported claim type you want to investigate. The report measures historical awards for that research population.

02 · Generate

Review and confirm

Check the report request and confirm generation. A report credit is spent only when you choose to generate.

03 · Investigate

Explore and ask further

Read the resulting comparisons and, from the saved report, use Ask Yerty to explain stored figures and terminology.

Good to know

Clear findings. Careful interpretation.

A historical research tool with practical boundaries, explained where they matter.

Does the report calculate my compensation?

No. It compares recorded historical awards, including cases where an adjustment mechanism was identified. It doesn't apply adjustments to your own salary, facts or potential compensation.

Are adjusted amounts recalculated?

No. Amounts in the published decisions already incorporate the mechanisms the tribunal applied. The report does not calculate a new adjusted award.

Can a mechanism belong to another claim in the case?

Yes. Mechanism flags can be case-level, so a flag identified on a case containing a wages claim may relate to another claim in that case. The report says when that is so.

Will every claim type have the same breakdowns?

No. The available analysis and explanatory content vary by claim family and the amount of usable published information. A comparison is withheld where fewer than 30 awards are available.

Can Ask Yerty discuss the report?

Yes. When opened from a supported saved report, Ask Yerty can use its stored figures to explain metrics and definitions. It does not independently recalculate the report.

Yerty Intelligence · Claim Adjustments

Understand what sits behind the award.

Investigate published adjustment mechanisms and compare the historical figures with the context needed to interpret them responsibly.

Claim Adjustments is a credit-based specialist report. Confirm the report to spend one credit; Ask allowances are separate.