Which mechanisms appear?
Explore where mechanisms such as Acas Code adjustments, Polkey reductions and contributory fault are identified in the published decisions.
How Acas Code adjustments and reductions appear in published awards, and the difference they make.
Explore how Acas Code adjustments, Polkey reductions and contributory fault appear in published tribunal awards, and understand the differences they can make to the recorded figures.
How often each mechanism appears in the published awards for this claim type.
How recorded awards differ with and without the mechanism.
Which mechanisms were recorded, how often, and how the awards differ when they are present.
Understand the mechanisms recorded in published awards, how frequently they appear and how award distributions differ when those mechanisms are present.
Explore where mechanisms such as Acas Code adjustments, Polkey reductions and contributory fault are identified in the published decisions.
Compare recorded award distributions with and without an identified mechanism, for supported claim types, where at least 30 awards are available.
Read plain-language explanations of the mechanism, the relevant population and why a comparison should not be treated as a calculation for a personal case.
Pick a mechanism to see what the report asks of it.
Select a mechanism to see the kind of questions Claim Adjustments helps you explore.
Explore the published cases in which an Acas Code adjustment is recorded, and compare the awards in that group with awards where it was not identified.
The recorded amounts already include the adjustment. Cases with an adjustment tend to differ in other ways too, so the gap is not the adjustment alone.
Published amounts already reflect mechanisms applied in the decision. Yerty investigates those recorded figures. It doesn't apply a percentage to someone's salary or produce a new net compensation estimate.
Case Benchmark covers the whole claim type; Claim Adjustments goes deep on one question.
Case Benchmark brings outcomes, awards and procedural features together for a primary claim type. Claim Adjustments goes deeper into one question: how recorded adjustment mechanisms appear alongside monetary awards.
Use it when the broader picture isn't enough and the adjustment mechanisms deserve their own investigation.
What is shown depends on the supported claim family and whether the sample is sufficient.
You control generation; a credit is spent only when you confirm.
You control the report-generation step. Ask Yerty can help open a prepared report builder, but a report credit is only spent after you confirm generation.
Start with the supported claim type you want to investigate. The report measures historical awards for that research population.
Check the report request and confirm generation. A report credit is spent only when you choose to generate.
Read the resulting comparisons and, from the saved report, use Ask Yerty to explain stored figures and terminology.
A historical research tool with practical boundaries, explained where they matter.
No. It compares recorded historical awards, including cases where an adjustment mechanism was identified. It doesn't apply adjustments to your own salary, facts or potential compensation.
No. Amounts in the published decisions already incorporate the mechanisms the tribunal applied. The report does not calculate a new adjusted award.
Yes. Mechanism flags can be case-level, so a flag identified on a case containing a wages claim may relate to another claim in that case. The report says when that is so.
No. The available analysis and explanatory content vary by claim family and the amount of usable published information. A comparison is withheld where fewer than 30 awards are available.
Yes. When opened from a supported saved report, Ask Yerty can use its stored figures to explain metrics and definitions. It does not independently recalculate the report.
Investigate published adjustment mechanisms and compare the historical figures with the context needed to interpret them responsibly.
Claim Adjustments is a credit-based specialist report. Confirm the report to spend one credit; Ask allowances are separate.