PricingLog into Claimant Hub

Coverage

What's in the record.

Case and document counts, date range, geography, and the fields we extract from each published decision — plus what the register doesn't include.

~120,000

cases

~140,000

documents

2017–present

temporal coverage

Updated Daily

corpus ingest

Great Britain

geography

What we structure

Five families of fields — not the schema.

The breadth of what Yerty extracts from each published decision — roughly ~30 field families across 25–30 claim types. This is editorial scope, not a column list.

Parties & representation

who the case was between, and how they were represented.

  • Respondent (type · industry · linked to Companies House where matchable)
  • Claimant (anonymised, aggregate only)
  • Representation (represented or litigant in person, each side)

Heads of claim

what was brought.

  • Unfair dismissal
  • Discrimination by protected characteristic
  • Unlawful deduction from wages
  • Breach of contract
  • Whistleblowing detriment
  • Redundancy
  • Working time
  • And the rest

Outcomes, remedies & costs

how it was decided and what it was worth.

  • Disposal (upheld · dismissed · struck out · withdrawn · settled)
  • Remedies & awards by component
  • Costs and deposit orders
  • Interim/application outcomes (strike-out, reconsideration, preliminary issues)

Procedure & journey

how the case moved through the system.

  • Litigation route (ACAS early conciliation → ET → EAT)
  • Hearing type & mode
  • Timing (time to hearing, time to disposal, duration)
  • Key dates (promulgation, hearing)
  • Document types (judgment, written reasons, costs judgment, reconsideration, EAT decision)

Geography

where it was heard.

  • Tribunal region / hearing venue
  • Jurisdiction (England & Wales · Scotland)

Scope & boundaries

What's in — and what isn't.

Volume

~120,000 cases · ~140,000 documents · growing daily

Time range

2017–present — online publishing began Feb 2017.

Geography

Great Britain — England, Wales & Scotland; Northern Ireland runs a separate tribunal system (complete, not missing).

Source

GOV.UK published decisions (Open Government Licence). HMCTS counts the claims · Yerty reads the judgments.

Claimant protection

Claimant-identifying data is never exposed — only aggregate, suppressed below small thresholds.

Fill rates & suppression

Methodology lives elsewhere.

Per-field fill rates, extraction accuracy by document type, and small-cell suppression rules are documented on the methodology page — not repeated here. This page states what the corpus covers; methodology states how reliably each field is populated.

Next

See what the record shows.

Findings are analysis built from the same structured corpus — patterns, awards, and outcomes HMCTS aggregates don't carry.