yerty/insights · launching late June 2026 · waitlist open

Every UK tribunal decision. Understood.

We've processed every published decision so you can see what actually happens — cases by industry, region, claim type, and the impact of representation. Any question, answered.

For employers, researchers, journalists and anyone studying how the system actually works.

What's in the Tribunal Data Explorer

Three ways to use the record.

Browse the corpus directly. Ask in plain English. Or read the patterns at a glance. The same dataset; three interfaces.

01 — Explore

Browse the full record.

Search, filter and read every published UK employment tribunal decision. By claim type, sector, region, year, outcome, judge.

Decisions matching
Disability discriminationRetail2024–25
Mr X v. National Retailer Ltd£28,400
Ms Y v. Supermarket Co£19,200
Mx Z v. Chain Stores plc£24,100
Mr A v. Department Store Ltd£31,800
filter · save · export100k+ docs
02 — Ask

Ask the record in plain English.

Ask Yerty natural-language questions. Get answers grounded in the dataset — with citations to the underlying decisions, every time.

What's the median award for disability discrimination in retail, 2025?
Across 57 retail-sector disability discrimination awards in 2025, the median compensatory award was £24,100. The range spans £4,200 (lowest) to £88,500 (highest).cited from 57 published decisions · view sources
natural language · cited · contextualAsk Yerty →
03 — Visualise

Read the patterns at a glance.

Pre-built dashboards across sectors, claim types, regions, and timelines. Customise the views you care about, export anything.

Median award by sector, 2025 (£)
RetailHospFinLogisHealthTechOther
built-in · custom · exportableat launch

What you can do with it

Three workflows the Explorer makes easy.

From benchmarking a sector before review season to checking whether a settlement offer is generous — the kind of questions that used to require a researcher.

Workflow 01

Benchmark your sector before it benchmarks itself.

Compare your industry's tribunal exposure against the record — claims volume, award distributions, time-to-hearing, the trends moving year-on-year. Ground policy reviews, training priorities and EPL insurance conversations in what tribunals are actually deciding.

For: HR · Risk · Insurance · Advisers
Specimen — claims volume by sector, TTM
Hospitality+14% vs LY
Retail−3% vs LY
Logistics+9% vs LY
Finance−1% vs LY
illustrative · wire to live views before launch
Workflow 02

Find out what cases like yours have been worth.

For employment lawyers and claimants. See the actual award distribution for claims like the one you're advising on — median, range, percentile — by claim type, sector, and region. The "is this offer reasonable?" answer the press release can't give you.

For: Solicitors · Claimants · Trade unions
Specimen — disability discrimination, retail, 2025
Median award£24,100
Range (lowest → highest)£4,200 → £88,500
Time, claim → hearing11 months
Cases sampled57
illustrative · wire to live views before launch
Workflow 03

Research a respondent's tribunal history.

Look up any organisation that's appeared in a published decision: how many times, which claim types, what the outcomes were. For lawyers preparing claims; for journalists checking corporate behaviour; for researchers tracking the system.

For: Lawyers · Journalists · Researchers
Specimen — major UK retailer, last 24 months
Total published decisions18
Most-claimedUnfair dismissal · 11
Outcome split (claimant won)7 of 18 · 39%
Total awards paid£187,400
illustrative · respondent canonicalisation in progress

From the record

Real outcomes. Real distributions. Real cases.

Every figure in the Tribunal Data Explorer ties back to a published decision. Click any number to see the cases behind it. This is what reporting on tribunals should look like when it's grounded in the public record rather than press releases.

A snapshot — median awards, 2025
Disability discriminationretail£24,100
Sex discriminationfinance£31,400
Race discriminationhospitality£18,900
Unfair dismissalhospitality£9,800
Unauthorised deductionslogistics£2,350
Claim → first hearingnational11 mo
source: yerty/insights · published ET decisions · figures illustrative until launch

A note on the methodology

Documented. Versioned. Coverage stated.

Every figure is reproducible. Every dataset is versioned. Every known limitation is published — including what isn't in the data (unpublished settlements, withdrawn claims) and where extraction accuracy is highest and lowest.

Source. Published UK employment tribunal decisions from the official register, extracted weekly.

Extraction. A documented pipeline — bronze ingestion, validated derivation, structured extraction — with field-level confidence scores.

Coverage. What is and isn't observable — published decisions yes; settled, withdrawn or unpublished cases no. Stated, not hidden.

Citations. Every figure links to the underlying decisions. No black boxes.

Get notified at launch

Join the waitlist.

We're launching in late June 2026. Join the waitlist and we'll let you know when you can get in — and what's in it first for your kind of work.

I'm a…
Email only. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy

Elsewhere on yerty

More from the platform.

Tribunal Data Explorer is built on published UK employment tribunal decisions. Unpublished settlements, withdrawn claims, and proceedings that weren't selected for publication are not observable. See the methodology for extraction accuracy, coverage statistics and known biases. Yerty provides data and analytics — not legal advice.